FAQs (Frequently
Asked Questions) about IRBs
What
is the definition of research?
What
is the definition of a human subject?
What
is the role of an IRB?
May
I use a central IRB for review of my research conducted at Maine
Medical Center?
Do
I have to use Maine Medical Center’s IRB if the work is going
to be conducted in my private practice?
Is
there a fee for the IRB service?
Are
there different levels of review?
What
do I need to submit to the IRB for approval?
How
long does IRB review take?
What
are some of the main areas of concern to IRBs when reviewing protocols?
What
are the required elements for an informed consent document?
What
needs to be included in my research plan?
What
are the rules regarding IRB review of Off Label Uses?
What
is "Emergency Use"?
I
made a change in my project, do I need to get approval from the MMC
IRB before I initiate the change? or The sponsor sent me changes
to my protocol, do I need MMC IRB approval?
One
of the subjects has been hurt while participating in my study, do
I need to report that to the IRB?
What
is the definition of a serious and unexpected adverse event (SAE)?
How
do I report a serious and unexpected adverse event?
My
sponsor sent MedWatch forms (OR sent SAEs that occurred at another
site), what do I do with these?
My
study approval has an expiration date, how do I renew my study if
the work is not complete?
I
have completed the work on my project, do I still need to complete
the Progress Report prior to the expiration date?
A
new person is working on this project, is there any required training
for this person?
What
is the definition of research?
Research is
defined as "a systematic investigation, including research development,
testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable
knowledge."
Activities
which meet this definition constitute research, whether or not they
are conducted or supported under a program which is considered research
for other purposes. For example, some demonstration and service programs
may include research activities.
What
is the definition of a human subject?
Human
subjects are defined as "living individual(s) about
whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting
research obtains (1) data through intervention or interaction with
the individual, or (2) identifiable private information."
What
is the role of an IRB?
Institutional
Review Board (IRBs) are independent committees that protect the rights
and welfare of human research subjects. An IRB shall review and
have authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval),
or disapprove all research activities.
May
I use a central IRB for review of my research conducted at Maine
Medical Center?
The Maine
Medical Center IRB has jurisdiction over any human subject’s
research activity (including data collection for research purposes)
within Maine Medical Center or at any facilities owned by Maine Medical
Center. The Maine Medical Center IRB will review the centralized
review provided by the National Cancer Institute’s Central IRB
(www.ncicirb.org), but will not
review or accept the review of any other centralized IRB.
Do
I have to use Maine Medical Center’s IRB if the work is going
to be conducted in my private practice?
No, MMC
does not have jurisdiction over research conducted outside of MMC. However,
MMC IRB will
review human subject research for private practice physicians who have
staffing rights at MMC.
Is
there a fee for the IRB service?
In keeping
with current budget imperatives and the increased load of clinical
research protocols, the MMC IRB charges a $1,500 fee for processing
a research protocol through the IRB and $500 for reviewing a protocol
via "Expedited Review". Extensive polling of other
institutions within the SRA, AIAMC and AAMC show this practice to be
customary and readily accepted by sponsors; this is in addition to
the indirect charges applied to all research projects. Our experience
with sponsors confirms this consensus position.
* The IRB
Fee is charged by and administered by the Research Accounting Team,
not the IRB itself. The fees collected do, however help to offset
the costs of managing all protocols presented to the IRB and are credited
to the MMCRI Department responsible for coordinating and managing the
IRB.
* IRB Fees
will apply to externally funded protocols reviewed by the IRB, but
not to projects that lack external funding and not to projects presented
with federal, state or local non]commercial funding such as NIH or
AHA grants. The fee applies to the protocol and is charged only
once. Accordingly, there is no charge for amendments or annual
reviews of existing protocols.
* The Research
Accounting Team will access the IRB's computer database one week after
the IRB meeting and determine which protocols are to be charged, gather
billing information and bill the appropriate parties.
* Many
sponsors will ask for a separate bill for the IRB charges and the Research
Accounting Team will accommodate those requests. If special billing
requests have not been made the IRB Fee will be recovered from the
first $1,500 received from the sponsor. Indirect costs will not
be applied to the IRB Fee.
* Waivers
from the IRB Fee will be sparingly authorized by either the Director
of Administration for MMCRI or Kenneth Ault, M.D., AVP of Research
and Director of MMCRI.
Are
there different levels of review?
There are
3 levels of review for human subject’s research. The level
of review required will depend on the anticipated risk to the subject. Please
see Research Categories for
a complete explanation of the levels of review.
What
do I need to submit to the IRB for approval?
For
new projects that are not exempt from IRB regulation:
The following
documents must be submitted. Please see the checklist at the
beginning of the MMC IRB application for
more details on how to complete the documents.
-
Pages
1-7 of the IRB application, submit page 7 with original signature(s)
-
Research
Plan
-
Informed
Consent Document (if applicable)
-
Peer
Review with all original signatures
-
CV’s
or resume(s) (if necessary)
-
Internal
Services Checklist(s) (if necessary)
-
Study
Classification & Website Information
-
HIPAA
Privacy Form (if necessary)
-
Any
other information you intend to give to a subject (e.g. advertising,
questionnaires, letters, information sheets)
-
If
you are requesting that your application be reviewed via an expedited
procedure, please submit a cover letter, signed by the principal
investigator, requesting expedited review
For
New Human Subject Research Project which are Exempt from IRB regulation:
-
Request
for Exemption from IRB Review Form, completed, with the original
signature
-
Data
collection sheet or tools
For
All Amendments to Previously Approved Projects:
-
Amendment
form, signed by the PI
-
Revised
protocol (if necessary)
-
Revised
informed consent document (if necessary)
-
Revised
informed consent document with the changes highlighted (if necessary)
-
Summary
of changes document from the sponsor (if applicable)
-
Copy(s)
of any other additions/changes to the materials that are given
to subjects, or used for advertising (if necessary)
How
long does IRB review take?
The amount
of time that IRB review requires depends of a number of things, including
but not limited to, the completeness of the initial submission to the
complexity of the issues involves. Generally, a protocol submitted
for full board review will receive an administrative review within
two days of the deadline. Completed IRB applications submitted
by the deadline for full-board review are placed on that month’s
agenda.
What
are some of the main areas of concern to IRBs when reviewing protocols?
-
Are
the risks to the research subjects minimized?
-
Does
the study promise an acceptable risk/benefit ratio?
-
Is
the selection of subjects equitable? Are there appropriate
justifications for the inclusion/exclusion criteria?
-
How
and from where will the subjects be recruited?
-
Does
the consent form contain the required elements?
-
Are
there adequate provisions to protect the subjects confidentiality?
-
Does
the research plan provide adequate provisions for monitoring date
to ensure patient safety?
What
are the required elements for an informed consent document?
In seeking
informed consent, the following information shall be provided to each
subject:
-
a statement
that the study involves research, an explanation of the purposes
of the research and the expected duration of the subject's participation,
a description of the procedures to be followed, and identification
of any procedures which are experimental;
-
a description
of any reasonably foreseeable risks or discomforts to the subject;
-
a description
of any benefits to the subject or to others which may reasonably
be expected from the research;
-
a disclosure
of appropriate alternative procedures or courses of treatment,
if any, that might be advantageous to the subject;
-
a statement
describing the extent, if any, to which confidentiality of records
identifying the subject will be maintained;
-
for
research involving more than minimal risk, an explanation as to
whether any compensation and an explanation as to whether any medical
treatments are available if injury occurs and, if so, what they
consist of, or where further information may be obtained;
-
an
explanation of whom to contact for answers to pertinent questions
about the research and research subjects' rights, and whom to contact
in the event of a research-related injury to the subject; and
-
a statement
that participation is voluntary, refusal to participate will involve
no penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise
entitled, and the subject may discontinue participation at any
time without penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is
otherwise entitled.
When appropriate,
one or more of the following elements of information shall also be
provided to each subject:
-
a statement
that the particular treatment or procedure may involve risks to
the subject (or to the embryo or fetus, if the subject is or may
become pregnant) which are currently unforeseeable;
-
anticipated
circumstances under which the subject's participation may be terminated
by the investigator without regard to the subject's consent;
-
any
additional costs to the subject that may result from participation
in the research;
-
the
consequences of a subject's decision to withdraw from the research
and procedures for orderly termination of participation by the
subject;
-
A statement
that significant new findings developed during the course of the
research which may relate to the subject's willingness to continue
participation will be provided to the subject; and
-
the
approximate number of subjects involved in the study.
Please
see the MMC IRB Informed Consent Template for suggested language.
What
needs to be included in my research plan?
For review,
the MMC IRB requests three copies each of any commercial sponsor’s
protocol and investigator’s brochure, OR three copies of the
grant for projects receiving non-commercial funding. Since these
are usually too voluminous to be copied to all the individual IRB members,
the investigator must provide a concise summary of the Research Plan. This
should be written in language that can be understood by people without
medical training, yet should provide enough detail to allow evaluation
of its scientific merit, of potential risks to human subjects and of
significance of the knowledge to be gained as a result of this study. It
must be written in the following format:
State the
problem and hypothesis
Previous
work that has been done by others or yourself
List of
the purposes of the study
Identify
all risks/benefits to human subjects
Identify
what is research and what is standard care
Described
patient population
Describe
how subjects will be identified, including who will obtain informed
consent, if applicable
Describe
the follow-up, if applicable
Describe
how the data will be analyzed
What
are the rules regarding IRB review of Off Label Uses?
When the
intent is the "practice of medicine" and a marketed product
is used in a manner that is not approved in the labeling, the FDA does
not require the submission of an Investigational New Drug Application,
Investigational Device Exemption, or review by an Institutional Review
Board. It is the physician’s responsibility to base off label
use on firm scientific rationale and on sound medical evidence and
to document the product’s use and effects.
However,
if the physician uses or plans to use data collected from off label
use of an approved drug or device to prove or disprove an hypothesis,
he or she must then follow the regulations and guidelines as put forth
in the Code of Federal Regulations including obtaining FDA approval,
and IRB approval.
What
is "Emergency Use"?
Emergency
Use is defined as the use of an investigational product in a human
subject with a life-threatening condition in which no standard acceptable
treatment is available and in which there is insufficient time to obtain
IRB approval for an investigational study.
The following
conditions must be met to justify emergency use:
-
there
is a high likelihood of death or serious outcomes unless the course
of the disease is interrupted; (AND)
-
no
alternative method or recognized therapy is available that provides
an equal or greater likelihood of saving the subject’s life;
(AND)
-
the
subject is in a life-threatening situation requiring intervention
before review at a convened meeting.
The Procedures
for Emergency Test Product Use:
The emergency
use of an unapproved investigational drug requires an IND or IDE. Contact
the manufacturer and determine if the drug or device can be made available
for emergency use under the company’s IND/IDE.
The sponsor may request acknowledgment that the IRB is aware and recognizes
such emergency use. If required this acknowledgment can be obtained in an expedited
mechanism through contact with the Office of Regulatory Affairs.
A circumstance
may arise in which an existing IND/IDE does not exist or the manufacturer
is unwilling to sponsor the physician under an existing IND/IDE. In
such situations, the FDA may issue an IND/IDE directly to the physician.
Requests for such authorization can be made by telephone:
The
Drug Information Branch (301) 827-4573
Division
of Emergency and Epidemiological Operations (202) 857-8400 (off
hours)
Notify
the Investigational Drug Service that an emergency investigational
drug has been ordered (215) 349-8817 or the off-hours pager (215) 960-9565.
Provide your name, the patient’s name, the name of the agent
to be used, the IND number and an office or pager number where you
may be reached
A consent
form must be typewritten and signed by the patient or by the patient’s
legally authorized representative before the agent is administered.
Exception: subjects
who are in need of emergency medical intervention but cannot give informed
consent because of their life-threatening medical condition and who
do not have a legally authorized person to represent them. In such
circumstances, the investigator and a second physician who is not otherwise
participating in the investigation or care of the patient must document:
-
the
criteria that the patient met for emergency use of investigative
article
-
AND
the lack of alternatives
-
AND
the inability to obtain consent from the subject
-
AND
the methods used to reach a legal representative and/or relatives
-
AND
the lack sufficient time to obtain the aforementioned consent
The physician must submit a report to the IRB within 5 working days after the
use of the test product. The report should include details of the emergency
situation that warranted use of the test article, the protocol that was
followed, a copy of the signed consent form, and any adverse events.
FDA regulations require that any subsequent use of the investigational product
have prospective IRB approval. Data from emergency use situations may not be
utilized for investigational purposes.
I
made a change in my project, do I need to get approval from the MMC
IRB before I initiate the change? or
The
sponsor sent me changes to my protocol, do I need MMC IRB approval?
The MMC
IRB must approve ALL changes to your approved project, including very
minor changes, unless they are made to remove immediate hazard to a
subject. For example, if you change your inclusion/exclusion
criteria slightly, that needs to be approved by the MMC IRB prior to
you initiating the change. Other examples of amendments include
(but are not limited to): changes to your questionnaires or survey
instruments; addition of advertisements or subject information material,
scientific changes to the protocol, formatting or wording changes in
your informed consent document, formatting or wording changes in your
protocol or research plan, addition or deletion of investigators. Please
use our Amendment Request Form to report ALL changes to your approved
protocol.
One
of the subjects has been hurt while participating in my study, do
I need to report that to the IRB?
YES! ALL
serious and unexpected adverse events must be reported PROMPTLY to
the MMC IRB, even if they are not related to the protocol.
What
is the definition of a serious and unexpected adverse event (SAE)?
Serious: Death,
a life threatening adverse drug or device experience, hospitalization
or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant
disability/incapacity, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Unexpected: Any
adverse drug/device experience, the specificity or severity of which
is not consistent with the current investigator brochure or consent
form.
How
do I report a serious and unexpected adverse event?
We have
a form! Please submit all of your serious and unexpected adverse
events on a “Serious Adverse Event Report Form” either
the single or multiple report format. Reports of serious and
unexpected adverse events that you receive from other participating
sites/investigators (for multi-center studies) must be reported on
a “Serious Adverse Event Report Form” also.
My
sponsor sent MedWatch forms (OR sent SAEs that occurred at another
site), what do I do with these?
Please
refer to “How do I report a serious and unexpected adverse event?” Also
note, the MMC IRB reviews reports of only serious and unexpected adverse
events as determined by you, unless your sponsor requests that the
IRB review all adverse events.
My
study approval has an expiration date, how do I renew my study if
the work is not complete?
Our office
will send you a Progress Report approximately 8 weeks prior to the
expiration date of your study. This report must be completed
and returned if you wish to continue work on the project after the
expiration date. Under the federal regulations, the IRB must
conduct continuing reviews no less than once per year, with no exceptions
(please see 45 CFR 46.109(e) or 21 CFR 56.109(f)). The MMC IRB
cannot grant extensions of the approved time without a completed progress
report.
I
have completed the work on my project, do I still need to complete
the Progress Report prior to the expiration date?
YES! If
you do not submit a completed progress report to close your study the
MMC IRB will be forced to terminate your study (per 45 CFR 46.109(e)
or 21 CFR 56.109(f)). When the IRB terminates a study because
of lack of continuing review, that termination must be reported to
the institutional official, the funding agency, and the FDA (if appropriate).
A
new person is working on this project, is there any required training
for this person?
Any person,
including Co/Sub-investigators, office nurses, research coordinators,
etc. in contact with subjects for research purposes and/or human research
subject data will need to complete the CITI training through the University
of Miami. Please contact the IRB office or check the MMC Intranet
site for the latest copy of the directions. Also, please note,
if you are adding an investigator or changing investigators, you need
to submit an amendment form.